Evangelicals Don’t Hate Cancel Culture, They Invented it: By John Pavlovitz

Evangelicals Don’t Hate Cancel Culture, They Invented it

Every day I see Christians lamenting the “Cancel Culture;” claiming whenever they face accountability for their words or their conduct, or for the policies or politicians they support—that they are being systematically silenced.

This is irony of biblical proportions.

The Evangelical Church in America doesn’t hate cancel culture, it invented it.

Ask LGBTQ human beings, who have been continually bullied into silence by pastors and youth leaders: who are berated and marginalized and excluded from spiritual community if they speak their truest truth or desire to marry the person they love or want to serve in ministry. Ask them how welcome or heard they feel in the Evangelical Church and how much of a presence they have if they want to be both out and included.

Ask women, who in most Conservative denominations are still not allowed to become pastors or to lead Bible Studies in mixed gender classes; who are still theologically treated as less-than and expected to be silent and submissive, relegated to the kitchen and the bedroom. Ask them how their claims of sexual abuse or domestic violence have been received and how much of a voice they have if they question authority or seek opportunity.

Ask people of color, whose most passionate opposition to equality still comes from white Evangelicals; people who daily face discrimination from a religious entity that is steeped in white supremacy and whose cries for justice in the face of unspeakable brutality by law enforcement are greeted with sustained resistance.

Ask Colin Kaepernick. Ask kneeling NFL players and outspoken NBA stars, who silently and gently asked America to see the racial disparities and systemic injustices still at work here and to demand the equity and empathy that Jesus preached. Ask them how the Evangelical church has conflated America and Christianity and told them to “shut up and play.”

Ask any actor in Hollywood who speaks out against homophobia or anti-Asian hatred or white supremacy, whose name begins to trend almost immediately as professed Christians rush to eliminate them wholesale because they cannot abide entertainers to also be fully formed human beings.

Ask Muslims, whose religious tradition is so often made synonymous with evil; who are continually used as a catch-all boogeyman for mass shootings and terrorism, whose presence is rarely included in Evangelical demands for “religious liberty.”

Ask transgender athletes and abused children and black activists and bisexual teenagers, and Harry Potter fans and Starbucks holiday cup users and progressive Christian pastors. They’ll tell you that nobody boycotts and silences and removes difference quite like Christians. They’ve built an empire on it.

The Religious Right and Jerry Falwell and Franklin Graham are the original cancellers of culture: of black culture and LGBTQ culture and Jewish culture and Muslim culture and non-American culture. It is their daily bread and butter messaging.

I’ve been a pastor in Christian churches for twenty-five years, and I’ve heard staff meeting discourses and witnessed the church lobby conversations and I’ve had a front row seat to organized social media campaigns designed to shut down criticism and remove diversity when it became too loud or too diverse to feel comfortable.

I can’t tell someone what their theology should bear or how they should express their moral convictions or what is compatible with their faith tradition—but I do think it’s hypocritical for Evangelicals in America to clutch their pearls and play the victim, and to condemn a perceived oppression that they invented, perfected, and continue to traffic in.

Jesus’ message was one of invitation and inclusion; of a table being expanded, of the least receiving love, of the foreigner being welcomed, of the lepers being touched, of the Samaritan being good, of the starving being fed, of the entire world being loved with ferocity. It was also a message that pushed back against cruelty in the name of God.

More and more, what I realize as I place the teachings of this Jesus next to the conduct of so many churches that bear his name, is that the compassionate, generous, open-hearted rabbi who preached the beauty of diversity, shunned political power, and condemned manipulative religious people—would be immediately cancelled by Christians.


John Pavlovitz is a writer, pastor, and activist from Wake Forest, North Carolina. A 25-year veteran in the trenches of local church ministry, John is committed to equality, diversity, and justice—both inside and outside faith communities. When not actively working for a more compassionate planet, John enjoys spending time with his family, exercising, cooking, and having time in nature. He is the author of A Bigger TableHope and Other SuperpowersLow, and Stuff That Needs to Be Said.

An interesting opinion piece

Leading your best trans life

In many subreddits dealing with trans and LGBTQ+ issues I come across comments talking about how trans experiences are bad, that they wish there was a brighter future, and how being trans is such a burden. It’s a theme that proliferates across the media, that being trans is such an awful thing that why indeed would anyone wish to be trans or seek to publicly live a trans life. For me this is both deeply upsetting, as I want to reach out and help folk work through their issues, and secondly makes me mad because being trans is not all whips and chains, far from it.

Transgender, Third Gender, No Gender: Part I

Rights Perspectives on Laws Assigning Gender

Intersex and trans activists and their allies contend that the right to “recognition everywhere as a person before the law,” protected under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, means that no one should be required to live with a gender marker that doesn’t fit them. As long as people are required to present official documents bearing a gender marker, states should not only allow people to change from “F” to “M” and vice versa; they should also provide them with an “X” or equivalent option. Otherwise, the binary nature of the documents will inevitably exclude people who are non-binary, whether they are also intersex or not.

Silence isn’t always golden



There have been a number of times when I have read an article which speaks to authors, activists, and lecturers who hold unpopular points of view regarding trans* people, especially Trans women. Most often the theme is to debunk their talking points or most recently, if such people should be allowed to speak publicly on any subject at all.

Today I read another such piece regarding a prominent feminist who is well known to hold some disagreeable opinions. Opinions which offended some people so much they requested she be uninvited to deliver a lecture. 

I understand the reasoning which drives such reasoning, allowing someone who makes what many see as hateful remarks a platform only encourages them to continue with their disagreeable actions, even if the event in fact has nothing to do with those opinions. Personally I feel torn by such arguments, though I find such people vulgar and their statements nauseating, I also feel that everyone is entitled to their opinions and no one should should seek to gag them. Imagine if this issue was from the other direction; people were seeking to silence pro trans speakers because they didn’t agree? The same is true of pro choice, racial and social equality. As much as it would please us, we have no more right to silence them than they have to silence us. 

This is the two edges sword of a free society, people are allowed to disagree with us as much as we with them.

If you find such people and their opinions so disagreeable then don’t support them. Don’t read articles about them, buy their books, or attend their lectures. If anyone asks you, tell them what you are doing and why. I know there are those who think giving someone a platform of any kind is condoning their actions through association and this may lead them to gain additional support. I will tell you this, anyone who voices support for for such individuals and their hateful rhetoric after reading or hearing something already held such thoughts and opinions from the beginning.

Birds of a feather stick together even when some of them do little more than hide in the background silently cheering on those who say what they haven’t the courage to say for themselves.